AI Blue - Book Structure
This document describes the logical structure of AI Blue, Book 8 of The Architecture as Code Series. The book is organised into six parts with 28 numbered chapters, moving from the blue team in question through each function of its craft, the team's own AI, the team in the organisation and the people who do the work, to experience and conclusions, followed by the appendices.
Table of contents
Part I: The Blue Team in Question (Chapters 1–4)
Before the transformation, the pressure, and the transformed team defined (defines B1 Anticipate to B5 Learn)
Part II: The Craft (Chapters 5–11)
The craft function by function: anticipate, detect, triage, investigate, hunt, respond and learn
Part III: The Blue Team's AI Team (Chapters 12–15)
The team's own AI: analysts' assistants, agent teams, verification and defence of the SOC's AI
Part IV: The Team in the Organisation (Chapters 16–20)
The team in the organisation: operating models, roles, decision rights, regulation and measurement
Part V: People and Career (Chapters 21–24)
People and career: the analyst at work, competence, keeping the craft and the future of the team
Part VI: Experience and Conclusions (Chapters 25–28)
Cases, a year on the blue team, conclusions for two organisations and the verdict
Appendices and Reference
Glossary, Appendix A (code examples: detection, case, playbook and mandate artefacts), Appendix B (templates and tools), references and about the author
Chapter structure
Part I: The Blue Team in Question
The part is introduced by part_i_the_blue_team_in_question.md.
| Chapter | File | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 01_introduction.md |
Introduction: The Blue Team Transformed | Introduce the book on its own terms |
| 2 | 02_what_the_blue_team_does.md |
What the Blue Team Does: Five Functions, Tiers and the Alert Queue | Describe the blue team before the transformation, as the frame for everything later: what its five functions are, how a SOC is organised in tiers around a queue, which tools carry the work (SIEM, EDR, SOAR, ticketing, threat-intelligence platforms), who the neighbours are (IT operations, the CISO, the privacy officer, the business) and how the work is measured today |
| 3 | 03_the_pressure_on_the_blue_team.md |
The Pressure on the Blue Team: Machine-Speed Adversaries, Alert Volume and Scarce Talent | Describe the pressure that makes the transformation unavoidable rather than optional: adversaries that use AI to shorten the time from disclosure to exploitation, to scale social engineering and to automate parts of intrusion; telemetry volumes and alert counts that exceed human capacity; and a market in which skilled analysts are scarce |
| 4 | 04_the_transformed_blue_team_defined.md |
The Transformed Blue Team Defined: Mandate, Functions and Degrees of Delegation | Define the transformed blue team: its mandate, its five functions, the degrees of delegation per function and the accountability that does not move |
Part II: The Craft
The part is introduced by part_ii_the_craft.md.
| Chapter | File | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 05_anticipate.md |
Anticipate: Threat Intelligence and Exposure at Machine Speed | Describe B1 Anticipate as transformed: threat intelligence, exposure awareness and hypothesis generation, where AI reads reports, extracts indicators and techniques, correlates them with the estate and drafts candidate hypotheses, and where the analyst's job becomes deciding which of them matter |
| 6 | 06_detection_engineering_as_code.md |
Detect: Detection Engineering as Code | Describe B2 Detect as transformed: the move from supplier-default rules and hand-tuned alerts to detection engineering as code, where each detection is a versioned record with logic, data sources, ATT&CK mapping, test cases, an owner and a review date, and where AI drafts candidate detections from reports and incidents under review |
| 7 | 07_triage_transformed.md |
Triage Transformed: From Alert Queue to Verified Case | Describe triage as transformed: the work that defined tier 1, deciding whether an alert is real and how bad it is, is now increasingly done by AI that enriches, correlates, summarises and in places closes alerts |
| 8 | 08_investigation_and_forensics.md |
Investigate: Hypotheses, Timelines and Evidence with AI | Describe B3 Investigate as transformed: scoping, timeline reconstruction, log and endpoint analysis and forensics, where AI queries data lakes, assembles timelines, proposes hypotheses and drafts the case narrative, and where the investigator's work becomes steering, challenging and verifying |
| 9 | 09_threat_hunting_transformed.md |
Threat Hunting Transformed: Hypotheses, Data and Agents | Describe threat hunting as transformed: the hypothesis-driven search for intruders that detections missed, now with AI that proposes hypotheses, writes and runs queries, and clusters anomalies, and where the hunter's judgement is deciding which hypotheses are worth the data |
| 10 | 10_response_transformed.md |
Respond: Playbooks, Bounded Containment and the Stop Path | Describe B4 Respond as transformed: containment, eradication, recovery coordination, communication and reporting, where the response is increasingly codified as playbooks and parts of it run at machine speed |
| 11 | 11_the_learning_loop.md |
Learn: Post-Incident Review, Purple Teaming and Detection Debt | Describe B5 Learn as transformed: the post-incident review, the purple loop and the maintenance of detections, playbooks and mandates, where AI drafts reviews, proposes improvements and tracks closure, and where the blameless, evidence-based discipline of review is at risk of becoming a generated formality |
Part III: The Blue Team's AI Team
The part is introduced by part_iii_the_blue_teams_ai_team.md.
| Chapter | File | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 12_the_analysts_own_use_of_ai.md |
The Analyst's Own Use of AI: Querying, Drafting and Summarising in Modes 1 to 3 | Describe the analyst's own use of AI in Modes 1 to 3: querying, drafting and summarising, and the discipline needed to use assistants safely when the data is sensitive |
| 13 | 13_an_ai_agent_team_for_the_soc.md |
An AI Agent Team for the SOC: Skills, Mandates and Containment | Describe the AI agent team of the SOC: triage, enrichment, investigation, detection-drafting and response agents, each with its own mandate manifest, identity, tools, data and autonomy level, and a human conductor |
| 14 | 14_verifying_what_the_ai_concludes.md |
Verifying What the AI Concludes: Review for Soundness When the Analyst Depends on the AI | Describe how an analyst verifies what AI concludes when the analyst depends on the AI to read the data at all |
| 15 | 15_defending_the_defenders_ai.md |
Defending the Defenders' AI: Poisoned Telemetry, Hostile Tickets and the SOC as Tier 0 | Describe the defence of the defenders' AI: the SOC reads text that adversaries can write, in logs, tickets, emails, filenames and threat reports, so its agents are privileged insiders that can be manipulated, and its platform is a tier-0 asset |
Part IV: The Team in the Organisation
The part is introduced by part_iv_the_team_in_the_organisation.md.
| Chapter | File | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | 16_operating_models.md |
Operating Models: In-House, Managed, Hybrid and Sovereign Security Operations | Describe the operating models available to a European organisation: in-house SOC, managed detection and response (MDR), managed security service provider (MSSP), hybrid and sovereign variants, and how AI changes the choice |
| 17 | 17_team_design_and_roles.md |
Team Design and Roles: After the Tier-1 Pyramid | Describe team design and roles after the tier-1 pyramid: what happens when triage is largely automated and the entry rung of the career ladder shrinks |
| 18 | 18_decision_rights_and_escalation.md |
Decision Rights and Escalation: Who May Contain, Isolate and Disclose | Describe decision rights and escalation for the transformed team: who may isolate a production system, disable an account, take a citizen-facing service offline, disclose an incident to a regulator or to affected people, pay or refuse a ransom, and stop an agent |
| 19 | 19_regulation_as_constraint.md |
Regulation as Constraint: NIS 2, DORA, CRA, GDPR, the AI Act and the Reporting Clock | Describe regulation as a constraint on the blue team's design: NIS 2 (Articles 20, 21 and 23), Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, DORA (Articles 5 and 17 to 19 and the register of information), the Cyber Resilience Act's reporting duty for actively exploited vulnerabilities, the GDPR (Articles 5, 32, 33 and 34), the AI Act (Articles 3, 14, 26 and 73) and the Cyber Solidarity Act, together with national transposition |
| 20 | 20_measuring_the_transformed_blue_team.md |
Measuring the Transformed Blue Team: Speed, Coverage and Quality of Judgement | Describe how to measure the transformed blue team without rewarding the wrong thing |
Part V: People and Career
The part is introduced by part_v_people_and_career.md.
| Chapter | File | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | 21_the_analyst_at_work.md |
The Analyst at Work: Fatigue, On-Call and Being Managed by Metrics | Describe the analyst at work: alert fatigue, on-call, the stress of incident work and the experience of working beside agents, and the fact that the analyst is themselves managed by metrics and monitored by the tools they use |
| 22 | 22_competences_training_and_exercises.md |
Competences, Training and Exercises: A Framework for the Transformed Blue Team | Define competences for the transformed blue team and how they are built and evidenced: detection engineering, investigation, hunting, incident command, working with agents (mandates, review, containment), data and query skills, legal and regulatory literacy and communication |
| 23 | 23_keeping_the_craft_and_making_new_analysts.md |
Keeping the Craft and Making New Analysts: The Apprenticeship Problem | Describe the apprenticeship problem: if AI does the junior triage through which analysts learned their craft, where do the next experts come from, and how do experts keep their own skill? Apply the evidence of AI Threat, Chapter 14, and the craft-keeping design of The Transformed Security Architect, Chapter 15, to the SOC: unassisted practice, seeded incidents, rotation between engineering and operations, structured shadowing, apprenticeship routes and the policy of keeping a share of cases unassisted |
| 24 | 24_the_future_of_the_blue_team.md |
The Future of the Blue Team: Will There Be a SOC in 2036? | Look ahead with the series' discipline: will there be a SOC in 2036? Treat the future of the blue team as a horizon register in which each trend is labelled observable, expected or speculation, and the author's own projection is confined to this chapter and Chapter 28 |
Part VI: Experience and Conclusions
The part is introduced by part_vi_experience_and_conclusions.md.
| Chapter | File | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 25_case_studies_and_anti_patterns.md |
Case Studies and Anti-Patterns | Collect case studies and anti-patterns of the transformed blue team, in the series' form: what happened, what failed, what the pattern is and what the control would have been |
| 26 | 26_a_year_on_the_blue_team.md |
A Year on the Blue Team: Nordvik Region and Hansa Mutual | Follow four people in the two organisations through a year on the blue team (2027): Karin Lund, senior security analyst and de facto detection owner at Nordvik Region; Piotr Nowak, shift lead at Hansa Mutual's Polish service centre SOC; Lena Vogel, detection engineering lead in Hamburg; and Thomas Brandt, chair of Hansa Mutual's Konzernbetriebsrat |
| 27 | 27_conclusions_for_nordvik_and_hansa.md |
Nordvik Region and Hansa Mutual: Conclusions for Two Organisations | Draw the chapters together into a conclusion for each organisation: what Nordvik Region and Hansa Mutual should do in the next two years for each of the five functions, what they should stop, and what each should decide at the management-body level |
| 28 | 28_conclusion.md |
Conclusions: The Blue Team Transformed | State the book's conclusions: what the evidence supports about the transformed blue team, which parts of the thesis hold, which are not proved and what would change the view |
Appendices and Reference
The appendices are introduced by part_appendices.md.
| Item | File | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary | 29_glossary.md |
Glossary | Defines the vocabulary of the book. |
| Appendix A | 30_appendix_a_code_examples.md |
Appendix A: Code Examples: Detection, Case, Playbook and Mandate Artefacts | Fuller versions of the artefacts introduced in the chapters. |
| Appendix B | appendix_templates_and_tools.md |
Appendix B: Templates and Tools | A directory of the templates and tools the chapters provide, with the chapter that introduces each. |
| References | 31_references.md |
References and Sources | Canonical bibliography |
| About the Author | 32_about_the_author.md |
About the Author | Background and perspective |
Companion files
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
BOOK_BLUEPRINT.md |
Premise, thesis, audience, the brief of every chapter, the foundations it builds on, the blue team functions it concerns and its status |
SERIES_FOUNDATIONS.md |
The conclusions of Books 1–7 that this book builds on, with the tables of contents of the earlier volumes for cross-references |
EXAMPLE_ORGANISATIONS.md |
Canonical profiles of Nordvik Region and Hansa Mutual, including their blue team profiles |
CHAPTER_AUTHORING_GUIDE.md, STYLE_GUIDE.md, AUTHOR_PERSONA.md |
Rules for structure, language and voice |
Canonical ordering
scripts/toc_definition.py holds the table of contents and regenerates docs/book_index.json, the mkdocs.yml navigation and the chapter list in BOOK_REQUIREMENTS.md. docs/book_index.json and mkdocs.yml must agree (tests/test_book_index.py).